Sunday 22 July 2012

QRSTF from the Past-1997





s
dddddONLINE bbC\\]mnnnOUNTDOWNsddddddds

klkkkkkkki




Planning is already in the works for both the QRSTF and CWSF 2013.. Keep in up-to-date

 CWSF 1997 -Regina May 11-18. 300+ projects






James and David Grant; Sr Computer Science; “Periodically Molecular”;  Gold Medal
Leslie Northam –Int. Biosciences; “Don’t Oil Here”; Honourable Mention
Matt DeMille – Jr. Physical Science; “Weather Forecasting” ; Bronze Medal.


This was the first year we really started to keep records. If anyone has pictures and information about the QRSTF before 1997 we would very much like to hear about it.


CWSF 97 Was a BLAST! The fair took place at the University of Regina for the most part, People stayed in the residences, Canadian Bible College (hahaha), and the Sands Hotel and Resort (Nice Place) :) Everyone got to meet loads of new friends, hang out with old friends, and overall, just have lots of fun! One of the Highlights of the week for me was the Hypnotist Show, the hypnotist had around 30 People up on the stage all making fools of themselves! :) 
Exhibitor List Divisions: J=Junior, I=Intermediate, S=Senior
Categories: B=Biotechnology, C=Computer, E=Engineering, L=Life Science, P=Physical Science


Name
Region
Div
Cat
Awards

Project Title
James Grant
Quinte
S
C
Gold

Periodically Molecular
David Grant
Quinte
S
C
Gold

Periodically Molecular
Lesley Northam
Quinte
I
B
Honourable Mention

Dont Oil Here
Matt DeMille
Quinte
J
P
Bronze

Weather Forcasting
James Miller
London Ont
I
P
Silver

Oleg Lavrovsky
Calgary Youth
I
C
Silver

Fractal Image Compression
Lindsay Slater
Simcoe County
I
C
Honourable Mention

D.J. Rodie
Regina
J
B
none

Lindsay Haight
Norman
J
??
Honourable Mention

Darren O'Reilly
Alberta
S
C
none

Jane Crosby
Halifax Dartmouth
I
L
none

Raymond Fingas
Northumberland -Clarington
S
P
Silver

Kurt Bronson
North Okanagan
I
B
none

Can Spinach Chloroplasts Produce Electricity?
Paul Wong
Central Newfoundland
S
C
Gold

Math Quest!
Amber General
United Counties
J
P
Silver

Detecting Air Pollutants in Akwesasne
Darren O'Reilly
Medicine Hat, Albta
S
C
none

Computer Controlled Object Recognition
Jill Chapman
Lethbridge
I
P
none

X-Ray Diffraction: A Study of Crystals
Robert Stephure
Calgary, Albta
S
E
Gold

The Artificial Taste Bud
Brad Veenstra
Pacific Northwest
S
B
none

Soil Contamination
Gabrielle Edwards
INTERNATIONAL GUEST

Andrew Spencer
Western Newfoundland
J
P
Honourable Mention

Hooks And Hassles-Fly Repellent And Fishing Line
Kyle Doerksen
Calgary Youth
I
C
Silver

Fractal Image Compression
Michelle Tao
West Kootenay
I
L
none

Eastern Medicine vs. Western Science: Acupuncture
Justin Lorieau
Edmonton and Region
S
B
Gulf Award

Veggie Energy
Kelly Larkin
Sunset Country
J
P
none

Detergents
Cecilia Lui
Scarborough
S
B
Gold, Manning Award ($4500),Weizmann Institute,1st in sustainable development

Waste Product of Entomopathogenic Nematodes: Antibiotic of the Future!
Dawn Alexander
northern BC
I
P
Honourable Mention

radioative tobacco smoke
Chris Gerlinsky
Leader
I
C
Bronze

Smartcards - Not So Smart?
Kurt Bronson
North Okanagan
I
B
none

Can Spinach Chloroplasts Produce Electricity?
Lisa-Danielle Stach
West Kootenay
I
L
none

Protein Production Simplified
Keith Vincent
Western Newfoundland
I
C
Honourable Mention, Bell Canada

Narcom PowerSuite -- Breaking the Speed Limit of the Internet
Aaron Klotz
Southeast Alberta
I
C
Honourable Mention

Undocumented Windows
Jean-Fran‡ois Morin
Cornwall
J
P
Honourable Mention

Plans inclin‚s et poulies
Martin Conklin
Vancouver Island
I
P
Gold

An IQ test for "Smart Fluids" or a Study of Electrorheological Fluids
Ratanak Ly
Metropolitan Toronto
J
L
Honourable Mention

Cleanness Of Air At Different Elevation
William Junkin
Victoria County
S
C
none

A Lingering Threat
Heather Hughson
Waterloo-Wellington
J
P
Gold

It's A Star's Life
Jeremy Uttaro
East Perry Sound
J
C
Bronze, Trans-Canada Pipelines

The Phoenex Mouse
Janet Wan
Sarnia
J
P
Honourable Mention

Magnetoreological Fluids
Henry Liu
Timmins
S
C
Gold, ISEF

Advanced Air Monitor
Soumya Mishra
Sudbury
I
C
Gold

Rubber Concrete
Danica Patey
Western Newfoundland
I
B
none

Beta carontene vs cancer in plants
Mark Johnson
Frontenac, Lennox & Addignton
I
C
Gold

Quicker Learning
Brad LeBlanc
Rideau-St.Lawrence
I
L
Bronze

The Effect of EMFs on Regeneration in Planaria
Tyler Beresford
Kingston, Ontario
J
L
Gold

Sometimes Green, Sometimes Blue







These are just some of the participants.. If you know any others please let us know.


WEBSITE: http://www.qrstf.ca

Mailto: qrtst@bell.net

QRSTF - Promoting science inthe Quinte area for over 50 years.


Judging Document:



Canada Wide Science Fair 1997

Judging Committee Report

Dr.E.L.Mathie   Judge in Chief

This report is written as an outline of how Judging was organized and implemented for the CWSF97 in Regina, primarily with a view to assisting with the organization of future fairs. The report covers the long period of preparation through to the week of the fair itself.

 Determination of scope of Problems/ Solutions

In addition to participation in the cwsf executive meetings, it was essential for the chief judge to come to grips with the expected duties of the judging committee. For CWSF97 this included:

            *Participation in Judging at Whitehorse                     1995
            *Obtain background information, Judging Manual     1995
            *Participation in Judging at North Bay                      1996

Formation of Judging Executive committee

 This committee was comprised of professionals who serve division, a formal leader for the special awards judging, and a formal coordinator of bilingual (French) speaking judges. The committee members were recruited between May and September 15, 1996.

Recruiting of body of Judges

This task began early and gathered momentum throughout the 6 months preceding the fair. It didn't end until the last day of judging! My early strategy included:

            *General Letter given to interested Regina Regional Judges       Mar 1996
            *General Letter given to interested Moose Jaw Regional Judges Mar 1996
            *General Letter given to interested Saskatoon Regional Judges Mar 1996

In August 1996, 1 prepared a generic judge list showing how many judges of each specialty, language etc., were thought to be required, based upon the previous two years. Since there is no way to predict the actual distribution of entries, this list must include some flexibility based upon the concept there can be changes in assignment between some physical scientist_. and engineers, between life scientists and broadly defined biotechnologists, etc. Based upon this generic list a summary of rooms required for breakout discussions and food services was prepared and passed along to our facilities coordinator. Estimates regarding the need to accommodate some of the judges, and to provide meals for all of them for a couple days were used to roughly plan a budget. The general effort was focused and intensified by the fall of 1996, by:

            *Calling individual experienced regional fair judges   Sept. _ Dec 1996
            *Approach University of Regina Faculty, Graduate Students Sept. 1996
            *Approach the Professional Engineering Association Sept. _ Dec 1996
            *Approach Government Departments                        Sept. _ Dec 1996

From January 1997 through the spring, the effort to recruit judges, particularly French speaking judges continued. It was also necessary to confirm all judges which were accepted thus far, in order that people firmly scheduled the time on their calendars. As judges were recruited, information was recorded regarding their communications coordinates, specialty, preferences, etc. This information was logged in excel spreadsheets, but in general it would have been better to go directly to the access software (which in our case was not available until much later). Recruiting continued, particularly seeking bilingual judges:

            *Sent formal letters to all judges already accepted
            *Approach Regina Service Clubs, School Boards

There was very little time to attempt to coordinate judge recruiting with special award judges already recruited by YSF from the sponsoring agencies. In practice there was a failure to communicate the names of special award judges until quite late in the process, when YSF thought their list was essentially complete. This was a significant problem and to a large extent it was necessary to assume until the last minute that no special awards judges, other than those recruited locally, would be available. I would recommend that the YSF distance themselves from this part of the process, and let the local judging committee fully integrate special awards judges nominated externally with those locally recruited. Once they have established that some organization was sponsoring an award, they could perhaps advise that organization that the local chief judge would be in direct contact with them and that nominees would be welcome. The local chief judge could promptly contact them and he/she could then also try and tap them for two days of judging instead of only one, and resolve questions of travel, etc..., at the same time. In the minimum there would be less difficulty in communications and it is less likely that judges could arrive at the fair completely ignorant of what was expected of them (as was the case in 1997 when a group of four arrived under the impression they were observers, rather than judges).

The generic list of judge teams was in fact altered by striking some judging teams and reassigning the judges to new teams to reflect the actual distribution of entered exhibits (ie during the last weeks before the fair).

Judging Coordination committee    Jan 1997

This committee eventually included 12 people who did not serve as judges, but worked in direct support of the judges. They helped with organizational details during the fair such as judges check_in at orientations and each day of judging, assignment of last minute replacements, facilitated communication among the judging groups, and generally provided a focus for exhibitors and judges to connect on problems, as soon as they happened. Before the fair they helped prepare the mail_outs to judges. The committee was intended to include one computer expert however this requirement was in fact met through the very competent CWSF office staff, which included one computer expert who became familiar with the YSF software (and in fact corrected many details).

 Judges Handbook

To date, the judges handbook has been provided by the YSF, who edited the document in consultation with the chief judge (due to 1997 changes in personnel this was done over the phone, at the last minute) and then printed it in Ottawa. The editing must reflect all local schedule and location details. The delay in this case eventually led to a delay in sending out the packages to all judges. This delay was critical: some judges traveling from long distances left before their packages were delivered and it was necessary to duplicate a number of packages after they had arrived. I recommend that the host committee prepare the manual and print it locally, with due regard to YSF expectations.

Software:

The software used to help organize judging for this fair included both EXCEL, which was used for all preparatory work and the YSF ACCESS code, which arrived late and with a number of errors. It was very easy to sort judge data bases with excel. The access code was however far more complete when it came to noting all information about the judges. The handicap of using the simpler excel code initially was that we did end up asking most judges for more information closer to the date of the fair. Without sufficient lead time with the access code we found it easier to manuafly reenter all data rather than sort out a code to read data from our files and enter them to ACCESS at the last minute. It is reconunended that the ACCESS code is used from the onset and that it should be provided to the host committee in the fall of the year before the fair.

The YSF office staff understandably insisted that the code must serve their needs, which seem to focus on communications, travel and the awards ceremony. Most aspects of registration and judging however are better understood by the local committee, who in any case are the ones actually expected to make these critical aspects of the fair work under terrific pressure. It is recommended that YSF accept that their code can likely be improved each year by its principal users (the cwsf host committee) and that a spirit of teamwork should replace the somewhat proprietorial attitude evident with this and earlier software. A focus on formats of common tables could replace the concept of everything being integrated into a single program so that YSF can extract everything they need from their tables and the local committee has more flexibility to do everything they need to do and decide they would like to do as the problems surface. It was clear that at Regina and at Whitehorse experienced local computer experts were recruited who were very capable of improving the code used, and that their efforts were decisive for the fairs but that their contributions were not readily integrated by YSF into the ACCESS code.

An important limitation of the 1997 version of the software is concerned with the scheduling of judge/exhibitor appointments for the day of divisional judging. The logic must be to assign judges to a team (this IS the case in the YSF software) AND assign projects to a team (this is NOT the case), and then sort the schedule team by team. Once the judge pool is established and the entries have actually all arrived, the division leaders and chief judge can develop the final distribution of judge teams and assign entries to each team. This relies heavily on the professional experience of the division leaders and even they would have a difficult time predefining which key words would facilitate a fully automatic sort as was the intention of the 1997 software. The 1997 YSF software attempted to sort automatically sort all projects against all the teams (at the 1:2000 level), which is nearly impossible when one fully recognizes the constraints. Done team by team the automated part of the scheduling involves arranging appointments at the 1:40 level. For the Regina fair the team by team sorting was done in an external (fortran) program, and the entire schedule read manually into the ACCESS code. One aspect of this external code, which proved quite important, was that as last minute changes and corrections were implemented the external code was arranged to NOT reschedule all the other projects viewed by that team. The software only juggled the project which was being changed, so that the appointment times for one project were changed but not the times for all the projects viewed by the team. In summary the software plays the following important roles for Judging:
            *Record Keeping (Internal, and eventually for YSF longterm records)
            *Sorting Judges vs Projects appointments, assignments, etc
            *Report Generation

Early Briefing of Local Judges

In order for the chief judge not to get saturated with calls in the weeks before the fair from judges already recruited, it is a good idea to plan an early briefing some evening about one month ahead. Most judges have not participated at the national level and the opportunity to learn ahead improves the process. The following points for the CWSF97 briefings were addressed:

            *outline the process, for the whole fair.
*As they register, have them check the their own record of communications, specialties. *Judging manuals at this time?
            *slides of earlier exhibits
            *use a theater at the university
            *visitor parking permits for this evening

 Data Entry of Exhibits        April 1997
As entrees arrived they were all processed by the CWSF office staff, and all information was entered into the ACCESS data base immediately. Usually on the same day (albeit some long days) the staff had not only entered everything into the database, they had made 6 copies of the project summaries (and retained the submitted copy on file), and forwarded them to judging.

Preliminary Sort Judges/Exhibits

As entries were received by the judging executive, they were sorted onto numerous benches all around a physics laboratory according to division, language and age group. Each division assigned his entries to teams by his own criterion, which included considerations of the body of judges previously sorted into each team. In this way the papers were formed into groups which could be the basis of an assignment to a team. One fully bilingual team had been set up for every division/age category. It seems normal that many of the French entries are late (a reflection of the provincial filter process in Quebec) so the bilingual teams were deliberately light loaded in the preliminary sorting.

Refinements of Judging requirements

In 1997, the 5th  division, Biotechnology, was being implemented for the first time. As soon as entries came in it was clear that there remained a heavy bias to life science entries and that the new division was headed for a disaster. In the absence of any direction about the new division, a broad interpretation of what constituted biotechnology, specifically including most applications of traditional life sciences and environmental issues, was developed. The division leaders then flagged those exhibits which were appropriate to include in the new division and we set out to phone the many regional representatives and/or exhibitors to seek their agreement for a change. This was done in a couple very strenuous days, and the new division was given a more reasonable launch than would have otherwise happened. I recommend that these guidelines be carefully relayed to all regions so that it is not necessary to transfer so many entries from one division to the other at the last minute.

 Once it became clear what the distribution of entries for this year actually was, the distribution of teams was revisited and some judges were reassigned to parallel divisions or to different age groups from the preliminary sorting. Once this was done the final sort of exhibits to teams was completed.

 Mail out project summaries,

For divisional judging it is customary to send a copy of the project summary to each judge in advance. In addition this is a good time to forward the judge's manual to the judges so that they have sufficient time to wade through it before final briefings etc. These packages went out by courier or were hand delivered as appropriate, leaving the university on the Tuesday before the fair. Judging _ Week of Science Fair: I append a summary of the judging schedule for the actual week of the fair. The important points revolved around getting everyone where they were supposed to be, when they were supposed to be there, and helping them accomplish what was expected of them! To this end there was a full briefing with all judges present on the Monday evening, and last minute words of encouragement each morning with announcements. A communications center was always staffed, as was the judging headquarters. All executives and the centers were equipped with cellular phones.

In future it would be most helpful if the chief judge and YSF coordinated expectations in advance with respect to how many awards are issued in each category. At Regina this was done somewhat late. Our assumption had been that if the biggest division used all available awards then smaller divisions would logically use fewer. The YSF however doesn't want to be left with award. money and expected a larger fraction of the awards to be issued. In the end this was resolved by increasing the value of some of the awards in the smaller divisions.

The role of sponsoring groups in the special awards varies from no participation in judging, through nomination of some of the judges, to a prominent role where their nominated judges expect to dominate the proceedings. The rule is that they have the last word. In general sponsors were most appreciative of the efforts of the local committee.

An effort was made by the judging executive to ensure that awards were spread around somewhat, although it is inevitable that some projects collect a number of large prizes.

During the judging process, media reporting can be a serious problem. The tight schedule doesn't permit the students to be monopolized by TV crews who are very insensitive to the students or the judging duties. During cwsf97 our security crew bounced one TV crew who had deliberately come into the exhibit hall during judging by a back route, after being told they couldn't. It was also necessary to remind the discovery TV crew to stand aside when they screwed up one student's schedule by more than 20 minutes, while a judge was waiting. I recommend that TV crews be allowed in late on setup day, given a private viewing on the Monday evening, etc., but not be allowed in during the judging process.

Conclusions:

In the sections above I have included a number of recommendations for changes which are intended to make the judging task easier and hopefully better. In my full report, I append a few potentially useful documents including the schedule of judging, my planned and actual distribution of facilities for judges, the planned and actual distribution of judging teams.

Judging the CWSF is a demanding task. Throughout the process there is a need for tremendous organization to facilitate the expected fairness and quality control which help make the experience positive for the students directly involved and gives confidence to this national effort. The full judging staff was comprised of 286 people, many of whom I realized had been pulled from very busy schedules and confronted with difficult .problems. Recognizing this, my experience for some months after the fair is of interest: I was overwhelmed with judges, who were grateful to be included and often expressed how their faith in the younger generation was "recharged".

The fair is owned by its many participants at all levels from all across the country and facilitated by the YSF. Host committees take their turn year after year and log thousands of hours Judging alone logged over 5000 hours, during the week of the fair). The host committees learn the most because they end up solving the majority of problems. I would encourage the YSF to recognize these efforts by improving two way communication with the hosts. Local sponsors also play an important role and I would further recommend that the YSF formally recognizes local sponsors at the awards banquet alongside sponsors which they have recruited nationally. In this way, local sponsors might easily become future national sponsors!

APPENDIX _A:                 Judging _ Week of Science Fair:

Monday May 12,1997

Visitor parking permits for three days
Coffee service
19:00_21:00
Briefing for all judges
Opportunity to see exhibits
Tuesday May 13,1997
08:00 _ 08:30
Judges Registration
08:30 _ 09:00
Judges Orientation
Final remarks before divisional judging
Split into assigned teams in Breakout rooms
09:00 _ 10:00
Division Judging without Students
10:30 _ 12:00
Division Judging with Students
12:00 _ 13:00
Judge's luncheon without Students
Buffet required to quickly serve meal for 250 persons
13:00 _ 16:00
Division Judging with Students
16:00 _ 17:00
Team meetings to rank projects (no students in Gym!)
17:00 _ 18:00
Team captains, co_captains, executive Dinner for 100 persons
18:00 _ 21:00
Group meetings of captains, etc., to formulate award winners.
21:00
Division Results to coordination group and then YSF office.
Wednesday May 14,1997
08:00 _ 08:30
Judges Registration
Final remarks before special awards judging Requires meeting room for 250 persons.  Split into assigned teams in Breakout rooms
09:00 _ 12:00
Special Awards Judging with Students.
Split into assigned teams in Breakout rooms or interview students
12:00 _ 13:30
Judge's Luncheon without Students.
Buffet required to quickly serve meal for 250 persons
13:30 _ 15:00
Special Awards Judging with Students
15:00
Gym cleared.
15:00 _ 16:00
Complete Special Awards Judging without Students
16:00
Results to coordination group and then YSF office , after final checking by executive committee
18:00
Judges Banquet

Dr.  Ted Mathie
Department of Physics
University of Regina
Regina SK

=====================================================================


CMS- Canadian Mathematics Society
Annual Report to Members
1996-1997
A new CMS programme of mathematics awards at the annual Canada-Wide Science Fair was started
during this period. As there is no mathematics category at these Fairs, CMS awards recognize
individuals who have a substantial mathematics component to their project and whose work is
judged to be excellent. It is hoped that the awards will motivate the organizers, the Youth Science
Foundation of Canada, to introduce a mathematics category into the Canada science fairs, as there
is in the US. The CMS Office was particularly helpful in negotiating and establishing these awards.
The 1997 Canada-wide Science Fair was held in Regina. Denis Hanson (Regina) and a team of
volunteers did a great job selecting the prize winners and representing the CMS at the awards
ceremonies.

======================================================================
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF SASKATCHEWAN 1533
May 12, 1997

INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Ms. Murray:  Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It’s a pleasure for me to introduce to you and through you to all my colleagues in the legislature, a group of 50 bright young men and women seated in your gallery, Mr. Speaker. They areparticipants at the Canada-wide Science Fair which, as you will
know, is being held at the University of Regina. I had the great pleasure of attending the regional science fair in Moose Jaw a month ago and I was most impressed with the projects there. So I can only just image what a variety of projects there will be at the university.
The Canada-wide Science Fair is the national exhibition and forum created by the Youth Science Foundation of Canada to showcase the achievements of Canadian youth participating in the National Science Fair program. There are currently 109 regions in Canada, Mr. Speaker, including 11 in Saskatchewan,
which are eligible to participate in the National Science Fair program. So there are over 600 young scientists, ages 12 to 19, with over 300 science projects, gathered at the university this week.
Please join me in extending to all of them a very warm
welcome.
Hon. Members: Hear, hear!

INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mr. Thomson:  Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And I want to thank the member for Saltcoats for allowing me leave to introduce guests. As you will notice, Mr. Deputy Speaker, we’ve been joined in
the gallery today by a large group of people who are here with the Canada-wide Science Fair. This is a group that in part was introduced earlier by my colleague, the member from Regina Qu’Appelle Valley. And I’d like to welcome this new group of people here today who are visiting and touring through the
building. I’m looking forward tonight to joining them at the banquet and having an opportunity to meet with them and enjoy some of Saskatchewan’s hospitality.
As you know, Mr. Deputy Speaker, these folks are joining us from across the country, and it is a distinct pleasure to have them here in Saskatchewan today. So if you’d join with me in welcoming them.
Hon. Members: Hear, hear!



INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mr. Thomson: Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I again want to apologize to the member from Melville. I was going to allow him to go on a little longer but unfortunately the last Liberal speaker drove off the student group so early, I thought I’d better get in a little quicker on this one. Mr. Deputy Speaker, it is again my pleasure today to introduce to you a group of very bright young people who are joining us
in the gallery from across Canada. These people are here in town for the Canada-wide Science Fair which is being held at the University of Regina, and I will not take . . . A nice, big wave. That’s very pleasant.
I hope that they enjoy their time here in Saskatchewan and the debate in the Assembly this afternoon, although my expectations aren’t that big on the debate part. I simply ask members to join in with me in welcoming them.
Hon. Members: Hear, hear!


========================================================================
Dr. Warren Wessel
Faculty Directory
Associate Professor 

1997 Chair of the accommodation committee of the Canada Wide Science
Fair hosted at the University of Regina

=======================================================================

UPSHALL PROCLAIMS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES MONTH IN
SASKATCHEWAN

Agriculture and Food Minister Eric Upshall has proclaimed May 1997 as
Agricultural Sciences Month in Saskatchewan.
The designation this year is in conjunction with the 36th annual Canada-Wide Science Fair, sponsored by the Youth Science Foundation Canada, for students age 12 to 19 to be held at the University of
Regina May 11-18.
"Saskatchewan has a world-wide reputation as a leader in the agricultural sciences and it's important that we acknowledge this fact," Upshall said. "Research and development in agricultural science are the foundation of Saskatchewan's continued success in agriculture. "Saskatchewan's agricultural sciences industries are growing rapidly, particularly agricultural biotechnology. We see considerable opportunity in the economic development and growth of our province and we consider it important for young people to know there are tremendous opportunities in the field of agricultural science. I am particularly delighted to note that the Canada-Wide Science Fair has introduced a new competition category called Biotechnology and this category will be judged for the first time when the fair is held in Regina. "This year, we are pleased to observe Agricultural Sciences Month in association with the Canada-Wide Science Fair, the pinnacle of the
science fair program which encourages youth to use their creativity and ingenuity in the pursuit of scientific discoveries. Saskatchewan students have performed admirably in this national fair in past years.
Some have entered projects related to agriculture and have received major awards for these projects," Upshall said.

========================================================================

Send us more information please..





WEBSITE: http://www.qrstf.ca

Mailto: qrtst@bell.net

















No comments:

Post a Comment